Comments on Bill Evens “WEEKEND
ECONOMIST: Full-scale fiscal union”, 29/01/2012,
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/European-currency-fiscal-union-Germany-pd20120127-QW9YA?OpenDocument&src=rot
Quantitative easing means effectively
fiscal transfer between good managed countries and poorly managed
ones, so unless the former are comfortable with that kind of
sacrifice, it is difficult to do in the euro zone where member
countries are sovereign and independent.
It may be fair to make this kind of
fiscal transfer explicit and let the recipient countries to shoulder
some of the costs. It could be in terms of long terms loans from
those better managed countries' governments.
Fiscal union is not absolutely
necessary, if the euro zone allows a second currency when necessary
such as the current situation with a fixed exchange rate with the
current euro, so those countries badly in need of a competitive
devaluation can adopt that second currency temporarily to boost their
international competitiveness.
A dual currency monetary union when
necessary is a solution to the currency economic and fiscal
difficulties in the euro zone.
This alternative will be better than
fiscal union where some nations will oppose it if there are better
alternatives that are available.
This dual currency zone will not only
retain all the advantages that the current euro have, but also have
the necessary flexibility for some countries to adjust through an
effective devaluation without the need to have politically and
socially difficult nominal wage cuts.
New problems call for new thinking and
innovation.
This kind of innovative thinking will
save the euro without fiscal union.