Comments on Lenore Taylor "Hu's UN statement falls short", 24/09/2009, http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26116643-5017906,00.html
It is interesting to see that the title of your article is in so strong contrast to other reports also on this website:
EMISSIONS: Praise for China and Japan
HU: Steals Obama's climate thunder
So, which is correct? You or the others?
What do and how could you expect more from China, given the offers on the table from other countries, including the US and Australia?
Are you objective and realistic enough as a journalist, or just wanting to grab more attention?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment